What They’re Saying: State AGs on Why They’re Suing Live Nation

Live Nation and Ticketmaster have found themselves in the crosshairs of some of the most powerful law enforcement litigators in the country this month, as the Department of Justice and a total of 30 state and district Attorneys General filed a massive antitrust lawsuit against the live entertainment giants in federal court. More than half of the states in the U.S. are signed on to the complaint, which alleges multiple violations of both federal antitrust laws and state laws across the country.

All told, the states involved in the lawsuit contain more than 80 percent of the United States population, due to the participation of nearly every population center in the country. So why did such a huge proportion of states sign on? And what are they saying about the pending lawsuit? TicketNews has compiled the public statements made by each state’s AG – which form a comprehensive rebuke of Live Nation and Ticketmaster and their long history of allegations that they’ve grown to dominate the entertainment business using cutthroat methods, often in violation of a consent decree they entered when they merged in 2010.

| FURTHER READING ON USA vs. LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT |
DOJ, 29 States File Lawsuit Seeking Live Nation/Ticketmaster Breakup
States Suing LN/TM Represent 80% of U.S. Population
OVG Colluded, Rather Than Competed Against, Live Nation Under Azoff

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has been one of the most vocal proponents of the antitrust action – which makes sense given the fact that the Golden State is both the most populous in the U.S. and the corporate home of both Live Nation Entertainment and Ticketmaster. Bonta, a Democrat, summed up his feelings in a recent interview with PBS News Hour with a fairly simple statement – “Live Nation can be a very successful company, and they can follow the law,” he said. “Right now they’re not doing that.”