- Broadway sales have highest gross in six weeks
- Dynamic pricing trend sweeps across Major League Baseball
- Ticketmaster's TicketWeb attacked in phishing scam
- Newcomers West Virginia, TCU boost big 12 schedule
- Houston remembered in musical-adaptation of 'The Bodyguard'
- Madonna, Knicks tickets lead TicketNews' events rankings
- Live Nation Entertainment's ticket resale may violate Ontario anti-scalping law
- Dave Matthews & Beach Boys headline popular summer tours
- Seatwave joins The Echo Nest’s Rosetta Stone platform
- Jeremy Lin sends Knicks ticket prices skyrocketing
AAI white paper targets restrictive paperless tickets
The American Antitrust Institute (AAI) has officially joined the fight against paperless ticketing.
On Friday, January 20, the Washington, DC-based advocacy organization presented the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and several state attorneys general with a 71-page white paper authored by James D. Hurwitz.
The message of Hurwitz's paper was clear: The government needs to sponsor an investigation into restrictive paperless tickets.
Hurwitz's now-public work concludes that paperless tickets may violate federal and state consumer protection and antitrust laws. The paper argues that transfer restraints on paperless tickets "unjustifiably limit consumer choice and depart from bedrock competitive market principles."
Restrictive paperless tickets require ticket buyers to present the credit card used in the original ticket transaction and a matching photo ID to gain entry on the day of the event.
While paperless ticketing is marketed to consumers as both a convenience and a protection, paperless tickets may also restrict consumers. Because a ticket buyer must be present at the date and time of a paperless event, the process of gifting or reselling tickets becomes complicated.
The secondary market has criticized restrictive paperless ticketing as stifling competition. Because of the transfer restrictions placed on paperless tickets, these tickets cannot easily be sold through popular secondary-market sellers, such as StubHub or TicketsNow.
Some primary ticketers further restrict their paperless tickets by only allowing transfers within their own ticketing environments or Web sites. These sites can prohibit sales below face value, set a maximum sale price, or charge a fee for the transfer.
Of course, there are positive aspects to paperless ticketing. Primary ticket sellers defend the practice as a safeguard against ticket scalping, bulk purchasing by software bots, and the sale of stolen, counterfeit, or lost tickets.
Ultimately Hurwitz's white paper is a call to action to a number of public servants and agencies, to whom it was addressed, and an opportunity to bring attention to the issue of restrictive paperless ticketing. Hurwitz previously authored an AAI white paper about the Ticketmaster/Live Nation merger in spring 2009.
Prior to the document's release, a handful of states had already discussed or passed legislation regulating paperless ticketing. This latest development could kick start similar legislation in other states.



Subscribe to this feed
Comments
All comments are subject to TicketNews' community rules.Post new comment +
Mr. Hurwitz misses some key points in his paper. Not all paperless solutions are created equal. The foundation of the Veritix solution Flash Seats has always been to provide a safe and secure place for consumers to buy, sell and transfer tickets. Making the gifting or transferring of tickets safe and secure. It's non restrictive nature is good for consumers and venues alike. In fact having one open and real marketplace for consumers to look for, see the value and purchase tickets is of tremendous value to both consumers and show producers. Teams, venues and artists want their fans to see the real value and opportunity associated with their tickets. Consumers want the same and get it with this paperless solution. It is not a surprise that brokers and exchanges that cater to brokers have come out against paperless solutions. It shouldn't be a surprise either that paperless ticketing can and does provide safety and convenience to consumers and value and openness to venues, teams and artists.